It seems that Hillary Clinton may have unknowingly played a large role in the racketeering charges that Nxivm founder Keith Raniere is currently facing in court.
Court documents filed by the US Attorney’s office prior to the trail detail how multiple members of he cult – including all five of the defendants who were indicted in the case – exceeded the legal limit for campaign donations when giving money to Clinton’s first campaign for president.
That motion, which sought to have evidence admitted to the case to support the racketeering allegations against the defendants, said that the funds were donated in hope of gaining influence over Clinton.
This plan hit an unexpected snag however when Clinton failed to even make it past the primary, with the former senator’s momentum halted by the man who would go on to win the presidency, Barack Obama.
‘Witness testimony, corroborated by documentary evidence, will demonstrate that at least 14 members of the Nxivm community, including at least five defendants and co-conspirators, made the maximum campaign donation to a primary campaign with the understanding that they would be reimbursed by Bronfman or Nancy Salzman,’ reads the filing.
‘At the suggestion of a political operative, who has since pleaded guilty to an unrelated New York state bribery charge also involving campaign contributions, the contributions were “bundled” and presented to the candidate at a fundraising event attended by conspirators, including Nancy Salzman.’
Op-Ed: Stalin Believed in Predestination – Just Not the Calvinist Kind
Obama makes the case for el Sayed and a Democratic Party that can disagree
Constitutional Attorney: If We’re Not Careful, the US Could End Up Like France
Ukraine’s Starlink restored as Elon Musk claims Kyiv violated terms of service ‘to kill people’
Breaking: ‘Explosion’ at Quaker Oats Factory Rocks Midwest City as Large Smoke Cloud Looms
Obama compares Trump’s White House renovations to ‘Saddam Hussein opening a Cheesecake Factory’ at Ohio rally
Trump’s go-to Michigan auto worker gets a job and the spotlight
Felon Accused of Shooting National Guardsman Slapped With Federal Charges
Hegseth Quietly Meets Netanyahu as Trump Weighs Massive New Iran Offensive
This Isn’t Want Dems Had in Mind: Cali’s Wealth Tax Plan Handed Billionaire Zuckerberg a Massive Pay Increase
Did He Forget About 9/11? Muslim Brotherhood-Connected El-Sayed Said US Was ‘A Lot More Safe’ Under INS
Second Amendment fight moves beyond guns with Supreme Court poised for big ruling
Top FBI Official Arrested Over Hunter Biden Laptop Case Admitted to ‘Running a Shadow Government’
Bush dynasty delivers another blow to GOP in Texas Senate battle as family member breaks ranks
Breaking: US Evacuates Middle East in ‘Sudden Exodus’ as ‘Advanced Stages’ of Iranian Assassination Plots Come to Light
The document goes on to state: ‘A cooperating witness who attended the event will testify that the defendants and their co-conspirators made the contributions in hopes of obtaining political influence to advance their own agenda, including targeting perceived enemies of Raniere.’
Clinton was just one of the many Democratic candidates who Nxivm members donated too, with DailyMail.com learning that the list also included Al Franken, Claire McKaskill, Ken Salazar and Tammy Duckworth.
Records obtained by DailyMail.com show that the group gave $10,000 to the Democratic Committee of South Carolina as well at a time when Hillary needed a crucial win in the primary.
It is a damning allegation, but one that may not come up now that only Raniere is standing trial, with his co-defendants all entering guilty pleas in exchange for deals with prosecutors.
‘Specifically, the bundled campaign contributions were part of an attempt to curry favor with a presidential nominee to advance the goals of the defendants and co-conspirators, including by obtaining indictments against enemies and gaining advantages in litigation,’ stated the US Attorney’s office in the filing.
‘The evidence of the conduit contributions also demonstrates the relatedness of the predicate acts, because it demonstrates the attitude of defendants and co-conspirators that they must “cheat to win” to fight the conspiracy they believed was operating against them.
Story cited here.
