News Opinons Politics

Adam Schiff: DOJ’s Decision Doesn’t Exonerate Flynn, But Incriminates AG Barr


House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) claimed the Department of Justice’s decision to drop criminal charges against retired Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn on Thursday does not exonerate the former Trump national security advisor, but rather incriminates Attorney General William Barr.

“Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about his illicit Russian contacts. His lies do not now become truths,” Schiff wrote on Twitter. “This dismissal does not exonerate him. But it does incriminate Bill Barr.”

“In the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history,” the California Democrat added.


Earlier Thursday, the Justice Department moved to drop its case against Flynn for charges of making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak ahead of President Trump taking office. In 2017, the longtime military man pleaded guilty in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and agreed to cooperate with the DOJ, but eventually withdrew his plea, citing prosecuting breaking their agreement to not recommend prison time.


CO Legislature passes funeral home crackdown after fake ashes, heaps of rotting bodies make national headlines
Utter Devastation: National Fashion Chain to Shut Down All 540 Stores Within Weeks
Biden’s Tax Hike: 11 States to Have 50%+ Capital Gains Rate Under Drastic New Budget
NY v Trump: DA’s witness testifies Trump did not direct him on Cohen repayments
MMA Fighter Rants About Disney Ruining Star Wars on Joe Rogan’s Podcast
Police ‘spread thin’ as anti-Israel agitators challenge understaffed NYPD: expert
Progressive champion and two-time presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders announces re-election bid
Columbia Caves to the Mob, Cancels Main Graduation Ceremony
Abducted 10-month-old New Mexico girl found alive after mother fatally shot, suspect in custody
Medical Student Left for Dead by His Own Friends; Allegedly Pushed Into Water, Not Knowing How to Swim
Texas Farm Worker Infected with Bird Flu Had None of the Typical Influenza Signs, Instead Showed One Disturbing Symptom
NY v Trump: Judge threatens jail time for ‘possibly the next president’ for future gag order violations
D-Day veteran, 99, spreads message of peace ahead of Normandy landings anniversary
Biden Economic Adviser Tries and Fails to Explain Monetary Policy – ‘Some of the Language and Concepts Are Just Confusing’
Noem addresses feeling ‘threatened’ by Nikki Haley, a controversial dog killing, Trump VP speculation in book

“Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case,” Jeffrey Jensen, the U.S. attorney that Barr recruited to review Flynn’s case, said in a statement. “I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed.”

Speaking to CBS News, Barr defended the decision to drop the charges against Flynn, saying he was “doing the law’s bidding’

“A crime cannot be established here. They did not have a basis for a counterintelligence investigation against Flynn at that stage,” Barr said in reference to the FBI.

“People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes,” the chief law enforcement official added.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

→ What are your thoughts? ←
Scroll down to leave a comment: