News Opinons Politics

Adam Schiff: DOJ’s Decision Doesn’t Exonerate Flynn, But Incriminates AG Barr

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) claimed the Department of Justice’s decision to drop criminal charges against retired Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn on Thursday does not exonerate the former Trump national security advisor, but rather incriminates Attorney General William Barr.

“Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about his illicit Russian contacts. His lies do not now become truths,” Schiff wrote on Twitter. “This dismissal does not exonerate him. But it does incriminate Bill Barr.”

“In the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history,” the California Democrat added.


Earlier Thursday, the Justice Department moved to drop its case against Flynn for charges of making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak ahead of President Trump taking office. In 2017, the longtime military man pleaded guilty in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and agreed to cooperate with the DOJ, but eventually withdrew his plea, citing prosecuting breaking their agreement to not recommend prison time.


Professor slammed for ‘despicable behavior’ with controverisal reposts on Charlie Kirk
Watchdogs: Child Predators May Exploit Popular Social Platform’s New Feature
Train attack video reignites fury over withheld footage of Austin Metcalf killing
Activists sound alarm on ‘deeply troubling’ poll showing support for Mamdani’s anti-Israel messaging
CNN’s Scott Jennings Lets Loose on Dems Over Charlie Kirk Killing: ‘That View Is Killing People’
Archaeologists Unearth Amazing Biblical Site in Jerusalem: It May Be the Site Where Christ Performed a Miracle
Charlie Kirk assassination suspect awaits charges as Utah residents describe alleged killer as ‘very quiet’
Erika Kirk Sends Powerful Message to ‘Evildoers’ Behind Assassination: ‘You Have No Idea What You… Unleashed’
White House closes week mourning Charlie Kirk, remembering 9/11 terrorist attacks in NY
Kash Patel’s false start on Charlie Kirk killer draws scrutiny, but FBI nabbed suspect in the end
Following Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers react to lethal political climate: ‘Violent words precede violent actions’
Why China wants to build a nature reserve in the South China Sea
California legislature passes bill prohibiting law enforcement from wearing face masks to shield identities
Utah students lift voices in prayer at vigil for Charlie Kirk’s Christian legacy: ‘Felt called by God’
Connecticut GOP accuses Democratic school board chairman of celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder

See also  DC mayor woos GOP as Trump police takeover nears an end

“Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case,” Jeffrey Jensen, the U.S. attorney that Barr recruited to review Flynn’s case, said in a statement. “I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed.”

Speaking to CBS News, Barr defended the decision to drop the charges against Flynn, saying he was “doing the law’s bidding’

“A crime cannot be established here. They did not have a basis for a counterintelligence investigation against Flynn at that stage,” Barr said in reference to the FBI.

“People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes,” the chief law enforcement official added.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter