CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Judge Boasberg Laying Foundation to Hold Trump Administration in Contempt of Court
Anna Paulina Luna Is Right That It’s Difficult for Moms of Infants to Vote in Congress, But Her Solution Is the Wrong One
UC Davis chancellor says violent attack on student conservative group ‘disappointing and embarrassing’
Israel Block Party at University of Texas disrupted by agitators
Despite Manifesto Full of Hate, Nashville PD’s Final Report on Covenant Shooting Comes to Its Own Conclusion
Dem senator looks to hijack key Trump budget process with tariff challenge
US shrimp industry hails ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs as saving domestic shrimpers
Army Considering Major Changes Following Hegseth Directive: Report
Trump’s China tariffs face legal challenge from conservative group calling them ‘unlawful’
South Carolina effort to mirror Trump DEI ban advances to state Senate
International Pedophile Streaming Service ‘Kidflix’ Shut Down with 1.8 Million Users
Trump Celebrates a Major Win as Jobs Report Blows Economists’ Expectations Out of the Water
Stephen Miller rips globalization as the ‘great theft of American prosperity’
Obama urges Americans to ‘possibly sacrifice’ in resisting Trump policies
PHOTOS: Biden’s ‘ambitious climate goals’ go down in literal flames by popular American beach
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Judge Boasberg Laying Foundation to Hold Trump Administration in Contempt of Court
Anna Paulina Luna Is Right That It’s Difficult for Moms of Infants to Vote in Congress, But Her Solution Is the Wrong One
UC Davis chancellor says violent attack on student conservative group ‘disappointing and embarrassing’
Israel Block Party at University of Texas disrupted by agitators
Despite Manifesto Full of Hate, Nashville PD’s Final Report on Covenant Shooting Comes to Its Own Conclusion
Dem senator looks to hijack key Trump budget process with tariff challenge
US shrimp industry hails ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs as saving domestic shrimpers
Army Considering Major Changes Following Hegseth Directive: Report
Trump’s China tariffs face legal challenge from conservative group calling them ‘unlawful’
South Carolina effort to mirror Trump DEI ban advances to state Senate
International Pedophile Streaming Service ‘Kidflix’ Shut Down with 1.8 Million Users
Trump Celebrates a Major Win as Jobs Report Blows Economists’ Expectations Out of the Water
Stephen Miller rips globalization as the ‘great theft of American prosperity’
Obama urges Americans to ‘possibly sacrifice’ in resisting Trump policies
PHOTOS: Biden’s ‘ambitious climate goals’ go down in literal flames by popular American beach
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
