CLAIM: During the Wednesday night CNN town hall Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden claimed the Founding Fathers did not intend for “everyone” to own guns.
VERDICT: False. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty.
Biden began his comments by suggesting that “no amendment is absolute,” adding, “None of you can stand up on the First Amendment, free speech, and yell ‘fire’ in here [or] you’ll be arrested.”
He then transitioned to Second Amendment rights, saying, “From the very beginning the Founder[s] said, ‘Not everyone is able to have a gun and you can’t have any weapon you want.’”
Matt Gaetz is out as attorney general, not clear if he can return to House next year
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston says Trump’s mass migrant deportations will create ‘Tiananmen Square moment’
Trump’s Pentagon pick Pete Hegseth ‘will get confirmed’ despite sexual assault allegations
Tren de Aragua Gangster Accused of Robbing One of Alvin Bragg’s Assistant DAs
Arrest made in New York City tourist face slashing after mom reports son to police
Justin Trudeau Vows to Arrest Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu if He Sets Foot on Canadian Soil
Massachusetts GOP slams liberal leaders after illegal immigrants accused of child rape arrested by ICE
Tom Barrett wins Capitol lottery by landing in great-grandfather’s office
President-elect Trump announces Pam Bondi as his new pick for US attorney general
Trump announces Pam Bondi as next attorney general pick
NYC councilman demands judge’s resignation for freeing career criminal who later shot cop: ‘Lack of judgment’
Paxton investigates ad network Musk sued over X boycott
Woman Killed by Her Own Dog Before It Turns on Officers
Prominent Bible Teacher Points Out ‘Red Flags’ in Trailer for Netflix’s New ‘Mary’ Movie
RFK Jr. health group slams Supreme Court for blocking COVID-19 censorship appeal
Contrary to Biden’s claims, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to be sure the citizens at large were armed in order to defend their lives and liberty. Moreover, the Founding Fathers wanted broad gun ownership in order to give teeth to the militia, should it have to be called together. This is why the phrases “well-regulated militia” and “the right to keep and bear arms” compliment each other, rather than cancel out one another, in the text of the Second Amendment.
Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 84 is very informative here, inasmuch as Hamilton argued that natural rights are exoteric in nature, the possession of all mankind, and therefore so broadly possessed and understood that a bill of rights to protect them was unnecessary. He went so far as to warn that a bill of rights would be dangerous because it would give the government the impression that it could take action against all aspects of freedom that were not protected by explicit amendments and/or enumerations.
Matt Gaetz is out as attorney general, not clear if he can return to House next year
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston says Trump’s mass migrant deportations will create ‘Tiananmen Square moment’
Trump’s Pentagon pick Pete Hegseth ‘will get confirmed’ despite sexual assault allegations
Tren de Aragua Gangster Accused of Robbing One of Alvin Bragg’s Assistant DAs
Arrest made in New York City tourist face slashing after mom reports son to police
Justin Trudeau Vows to Arrest Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu if He Sets Foot on Canadian Soil
Massachusetts GOP slams liberal leaders after illegal immigrants accused of child rape arrested by ICE
Tom Barrett wins Capitol lottery by landing in great-grandfather’s office
President-elect Trump announces Pam Bondi as his new pick for US attorney general
Trump announces Pam Bondi as next attorney general pick
NYC councilman demands judge’s resignation for freeing career criminal who later shot cop: ‘Lack of judgment’
Paxton investigates ad network Musk sued over X boycott
Woman Killed by Her Own Dog Before It Turns on Officers
Prominent Bible Teacher Points Out ‘Red Flags’ in Trailer for Netflix’s New ‘Mary’ Movie
RFK Jr. health group slams Supreme Court for blocking COVID-19 censorship appeal
Hamilton wrote, “I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.”
Story cited here.
