Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Fauci’s Nightmare Worsens – Guess Who Just Got a Copy of His COVID-Era Phone?

Trump allies push to arm president with new tariff weapon to punish countries ‘ripping off’ America

Reporter’s Notebook: Summer ends, but the Senate’s fall crunch begins

Blue-State Paradise: New York Police Leader and Ex-Con Husband Helped Gang-Banger Son Plan, Execute Failed Hit Job, According to Authorities

FBI’s ‘clever’ Trump-Russia probe codename ignites suspicion something deeper was at play

Trump Responds to Reports About Dwindling U.S. Weapons Stockpiles, Promises ‘Long Term Jail Sentences’

Bernie Sanders Tells James Carville to Kick Rocks: ‘Start His Own Party’ If He Doesn’t Like Socialism

Tucker Carlson pitches 10-point vision for third-party movement

Luigi Mangione seeks polished look with bid to ditch jail clothes for hearing in CEO slaying case

WATCH: GOP split over Rand Paul’s DOJ strategy in Fauci contempt push

Miss North Carolina USA loses crown after organizer condemns ‘racism, homophobia, transphobia’

Watch: Trump Jumps Into Action to Corral Toddler Wandering Onstage

Watch: Mamdani Booed off Stage at Police Event – Moments Later Critic Tried to Confront Mayor, Collapsed in Cardiac Arrest

US pauses government operations in cartel-ridden Mexican state

Trump’s endorsement collides with $1.3M effort to oust House ally

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020