Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Train attack video reignites fury over withheld footage of Austin Metcalf killing

Archaeologists Unearth Amazing Biblical Site in Jerusalem: It May Be the Site Where Christ Performed a Miracle

Charlie Kirk assassination suspect awaits charges as Utah residents describe alleged killer as ‘very quiet’

Erika Kirk Sends Powerful Message to ‘Evildoers’ Behind Assassination: ‘You Have No Idea What You… Unleashed’

White House closes week mourning Charlie Kirk, remembering 9/11 terrorist attacks in NY

Kash Patel’s false start on Charlie Kirk killer draws scrutiny, but FBI nabbed suspect in the end

Following Kirk’s assassination, lawmakers react to lethal political climate: ‘Violent words precede violent actions’

Why China wants to build a nature reserve in the South China Sea

California legislature passes bill prohibiting law enforcement from wearing face masks to shield identities

Utah students lift voices in prayer at vigil for Charlie Kirk’s Christian legacy: ‘Felt called by God’

Connecticut GOP accuses Democratic school board chairman of celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder

Democratic donors reluctant to give to Biden’s presidential library: report

Charlie Kirk’s widow tells America: ‘You have no idea what you have unleashed’

Erika Kirk delivers moving tribute to husband, Charlie: ‘I will never let your legacy die’

Ivanka Trump Makes Rare TV Appearance to Honor Charlie Kirk

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020