Washington Post Op-ed: ‘Give the Elites a Bigger Say in Choosing the President’

The Washington Post is taking criticism for an op-ed published Tuesday by Marquette University political science professor Julia Azari, titled: “It’s time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president.”

Citing the “rocky start” to the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, Azari suggests that the process of choosing the nominee be taken from the people and returned to the politicians:

The current process is clearly flawed, but what would be better? … A better primary system would empower elites to bargain and make decisions, instructed by voters.

One lesson from the 2020 and 2016 election cycles is that a lot of candidates, many of whom are highly qualified and attract substantial followings, will inevitably enter the race. The system as it works now — with a long informal primary, lots of attention to early contests and sequential primary season that unfolds over several months — is great at testing candidates to see whether they have the skills to run for president. What it’s not great at is choosing among the many candidates who clear that bar, or bringing their different ideological factions together, or reconciling competing priorities. A process in which intermediate representatives — elected delegates who understand the priorities of their constituents — can bargain without being bound to specific candidates might actually produce nominees that better reflect what voters want.

Proceedings paused against ‘Zizian’ murder suspect following competency claims

Stacy Garrity’s campaign releases new ominous ad targeting Josh Shapiro

DOJ walks back Biden-era abortion policy, bars VA from funding procedures

Supreme Court rules on legality of Trump National Guard deployment to Illinois

End of Story: New York Times Admits There’s Zero Evidence Trump Had Anything to Do with Epstein’s Abuse, Trafficking of Minors

Missouri Governor Blasts Chiefs’ Decision to ‘Abandon’ Kansas City in Blistering Statement

Brown University students shaken as relief, anger collide after suspected shooter’s death

Major university cuts ties with US-sanctioned UN expert on Palestinian issues, watchdog says

More female inmates allege sexual abuse in transgender separation case

Watch: The Precious Moment When Grandma Jeanie from Target Met Erika Kirk at AmericaFest

Social Security report confirms drastic improvements despite Warren’s disbelief

America Is Healing: Justice Finally Done for Christian Student Who Was Failed by Trans TA Over Bible-Based Gender Paper

Apex predator threatening Northwest salmon sparks rare bipartisan push to ‘kill more’

Boasberg orders Trump to bring back CECOT migrant class deported in March

Europe backs Greenland as Trump renews threat of annexation for ‘national security’

Azari suggests that the parties should use what she calls “preference primaries,” which would “allow voters to rank their choices among candidates, as well as to register opinions about their issue priorities.”

After a perfunctory voting process, wlites would be able to choose a nominee based on information about what the voters want.

She acknowledges that the idea is “labor-intensive and a little risky.”

The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, who is the world’s richest man. The paper’s slogan, adopted as an intended rebuke to President Donald Trump, is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

That phrase was trending on Twitter on Wednesday morning as readers reacted ironically to the op-ed.

The headline right below “democracy dies in darkness” is some A+ work

— Greg (@gwiss) February 19, 2020

>"Democracy dies in darkness"

>"Do people actually want more Democracy in their lives" pic.twitter.com/p7fPf5dFVX

— ｓａｌ🌹🏴🏴‍☠️ (@ProjektVayo) February 19, 2020