Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.
Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.
He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.
“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.
“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.
YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.
“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”
The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.
Keith Ellison’s son to keep 6-figure Minneapolis councilmember salary during fellowship at Harvard
List reveals items FBI seized from John Bolton’s home during raid
Comedy Writer Arrested Over His X Posts Doubles Down as He Arrives to Courthouse
Man Arrested After Driving Across the US to Target Catholic Monastery: Police
Lawyers challenge deportation of hundreds of minors to Guatemala
Trump admin to send workers abroad to boost US shipbuilding, counter China’s edge
Republicans to launch new voter mobilization strategy in key states
‘Crystal Ball’ moves Virginia governor race to ‘likely Democrat’ in boost for Spanberger
Details: New Trove of Info Reveals More Perversion from Minneapolis Trans Shooter and Newly Discovered Ex-Girlfriend
Sick: Leftist Protesters Target JD Vance as He Pays Respects at Site of Catholic School Shooting
Dog-walking man stumbles on suspected debris from Reagan National plane crash 7 months later
Man swimming across Pennsylvania river drowns near family picnic area
Trump’s foreign aid clawback rattles Senate ahead of funding fight
Federal judges anonymously criticize Supreme Court for overturning decisions with emergency rulings
Trump’s $2 billion DC ‘beautification’ plan forcing fiscal hawks to stomach more spending
That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.
YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.
Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.
The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.
Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.
Story cited here.
