First Amendment News Opinons Politics

YouTube Censors Rand Paul and He’s Mad

Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday accused YouTube of censoring his speech from the Senate floor last week about the impeachment trial — a speech in which he mentioned a name some believe to be the whistleblower who ignited the investigation into President Trump.

Mr. Paul called it “chilling and disturbing” for the media giant to pull down his video.

He pointed out that while he mentioned names and connections, he never identified anyone as being the whistleblower. He said he doesn’t actually know the whistleblower’s name.


“Now, even protected speech, such as that of a senator on the Senate floor, can be blocked from getting to the American people. This is dangerous and politically biased,” he said.

“Apparently, YouTube has taken it upon itself to decide what questions can even be asked in the public debate, including on the Senate floor,” the Kentucky Republican added.

YouTube defended its move, saying that’s its policy.

“Videos, comments, and other forms of content that mention the leaked whistleblower’s name violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines and will be removed from YouTube,” said Ivy Choi, a spokesperson. “We enforce our policies consistently without regard to political leaning and have removed hundreds of videos and over ten thousand comments that contained the name.”

The spokesperson did not say how YouTube knew the name of the whistleblower.


Trump says China will work with him to stop fentanyl trafficking
Trump says he could deploy US military in American cities, claims ‘courts wouldn’t get involved’
Federal employees, public school teachers, and government officials donated to Jay Jones after text scandal
Newsom invokes Scripture in attack on GOP over shutdown affecting food assistance: ‘Cruelty is the policy’
Pentagon orders managers to fire civilian workers with ‘speed and conviction’
Nanny found with suspected psychedelic mushrooms accused of fatal stabbing, screwdriver attack on family
Trump fires entire design review panel overseeing planned ballroom and arch
Mamdani forced to address unearthed video exposing vile NYPD comparison
Illegal immigrant deported 30 years after brutal murder of Philadelphia teen Eddie Polec on church steps
Senate Republicans Defect, Ignore Vance and Vote to Block Trump Trade Strategy
Florida sets record with 15th execution as man dies for 1998 rape, murder of neighbor
Allegedly Disease-Ridden, ‘Aggressive’ Research Monkeys Escape After Truck Crash
‘President Is Losing Support’: MTG in Heated Clash Over Government Shutdown
Ex-Army sergeant sentenced for trying to give state secrets to China after mental health spiral
An Unstated Objective for Dems’ Prolonged Shutdown in Relation to Midterms May Have Just Been Revealed
See also  Biden staffers exercised presidential powers without authorization, House GOP Oversight report finds

That has been one of the thornier issues in the debate. No official source has confirmed the name, so organizations such as YouTube are generally operating off of a belief — effectively lending more credence to the notion that the whistleblower is the person whose name appears in the video.

YouTube isn’t the only one to refuse to accommodate Mr. Paul in his determination to use the name.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who presided over the impeachment trial of President Trump in the Senate, refused to read a question Mr. Paul wanted to ask. He apparently thought the question trod too closely to the identity of the whistleblower.

Mr. Paul did get his say later, during time allotted for senators to speak, when he read out the question he’d wanted to ask had he been allowed by the chief justice.

The whistleblower’s complaint last summer launched the impeachment of Mr. Trump.

Articles containing the accusation are part of the Congressional Record, and Mr. Paul’s speech is also still part of that permanent record.

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter