House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Dem Senator Van Hollen meets, shakes hands with Abrego Garcia; El Salvador says inmate will remain in custody
Ohio man arrested after investigators discover IED, videos, photos of bomb-making materials
Van Hollen meets with Abrego Garcia after several failed attempts
Trump Reveals Why Jimmy Carter ‘Died a Happy Man’: The Punch Line Will Have You in Stitches
Letitia James launches high-dollar fundraiser after alleged mortgage fraud case
Thomas Massie Under Fire After He Sounds the Alarm on Real ID Laws Trump Wants
HUD puts half-occupied headquarters building in DC up for sale
‘Dignitary harm’: DOJ defends White House AP ban at appeals court
Trump Emergency Request Works – Supreme Court Schedules Rare Hearing
Texas press conference in Austin Metcalf killing devolves into chaos over track meet stabbing
Abigail Spanberger outraises Winsome Earle-Sears in Virginia governor’s race
Major Twist to FSU Shooting: Perpetrator’s Close Ties to Law Enforcement Uncovered
Supreme Court poised to make major decision that could set limits on the power of district judges
Justice Kagan denies emergency appeal to halt deportation of Mexican nationals claiming asylum from cartel
Trump admin imposes sanctions against Bank of Yemen for supporting Houthis
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
