House impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) repeatedly told the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Wednesday night that the House case was “proven beyond any doubt at all.”
Nadler’s odd, and repeated, claim seemed to undermine claims by Democrats that they needed to see more witnesses and documents in the trial. The House Judiciary Committee chairman played an unusually understated role in the first day of the question-and-answer session in the Senate.
Republicans have asked that if Democrats are so confident in their case — confident enough to impeach a president for only the third time in American history — then they should allow that case to stand or fall based on the evidence collected in the House, not by adding new evidence.
Trump to sign order lifting sanctions on Syria
House Freedom Caucus targets Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ with concerns about budget deficit
ChatGPT Users Are Being Involuntarily Committed – What Is Going On?
Trump Administration Finds Harvard Violated Federal Law, Floats Major Punishment
DOJ charges hundreds of people in $14.6 billion healthcare fraud takedown
Salena Zito: Trump shooting sparked his ‘urgency of now’
Iranian Cleric Issues Fatwa Against Trump
Key House GOP moderate Don Bacon won’t seek re-election
New Satellite Imagery Shows Iran Is Up to Something at Fordow
Supreme Court to hear Republican challenge that could shake up US elections
Abrego Garcia’s Legal Team Demands That Federal Attorneys Pay the Price
Missouri factory worker found dead inside industrial oven, police say
New Birthright Citizenship Challenges Filed Shortly After SCOTUS Ruling
‘Thank you for your attention to this matter’: Trump’s latest viral moment
Senate begins vote-a-rama on Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ and more top headlines
Nadler added, at one point, that simply because the House Democrats had, in his view, proven their case beyond all doubt, that was not a reason to stop adding more evidence. It “doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have more proof if it comes forward,” he told the Senate.
Democrats and White House lawyers disagreed over the standard of proof. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Senators they were the individual arbiters of the standard required, according to their constitutional oath.
Deputy White House Counsel Patrick Philbin disagreed, arguing that the Constitution likened impeachment to a criminal process and therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt was required.
Story cited here.
