On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Texas man who fatally shot 23 people at El Paso Walmart in 2019 to plead guilty to murder
Dem elites accused of slapping small-town cops with ‘witch hunt’ fines twice their pay
Indiana takes first action in long-shot plan to acquire parts of Illinois
Motorist arrested after allegedly trying to run driver of Tesla off the road at high speeds: report
Arizona suspect in bus stop hatchet attack charged with murder after victim dies
Rap sheets, photos of suspected Tren de Aragua gang members Trump admin tried to deport before SCOTUS ruling
Tulsi Gabbard Declassifies Biden’s ‘Domestic Terrorism’ Document: What ‘Terrorists’ Did He Have in Mind?
Medal of Honor Recipient Reenlists in Marine Corps 15 Years After Leaving the Service
JD Vance has ‘exchange of opinions’ on issues like deportations during meeting with top Vatican official
Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s Wife Falls Silent When Interviewer Brings Up Protection Order Filed Against Husband
College Student on Spring Break Spots a Tesla, Ruins Life with Next Alleged Move
House Republican changes Van Hollen’s office plaque after El Salvador visit
Biden Commuted Child Killer’s Sentence, Four Months Later He’s Facing the Death Penalty Again
US senator blasts president of Mexico, says toxic sewage dump threatens ‘national security’
Observatory Warns US Volcano Could Blow Again and These Are the Signs to Watch For
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
