On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Wheels come off shutdown talks as Schumer counteroffer frustrates GOP
Hungarian leader says he wants to hire Karoline Leavitt after she rips ‘fake news’ in impromptu takedown
McDonald’s meltdown: Michigan woman wanted after allegedly tossing hot coffee at manager
Cornell University to pay $60M in deal with Trump administration to restore federal funding
Coast Guard swoops in to save stranded sailors from sinking boat hundreds of miles off coast
Liberal Media Worried That Mamdani Will Chase Away Swing Voters From The Democratic Party
Daily on Energy: Quote of the week, Hungary seeks oil waiver, and a ‘drill, baby, drill’ update
Report: Rubio Views Vance as 2028 GOP Frontrunner and Plans to Support Him
Orban lays on Trump charm offensive, seeks to sway him on Russian oil and Ukraine peace
Obama once urged Black men to back Harris — then he, Democrats reversed race rhetoric legacy in 2025
House GOP civil war ignites over ‘ludicrous’ bill to defund NYC while Mamdani is mayor
WWII Vet Stuns UK TV Anchors by Telling Them the War Wasn’t Worth It – The Freedom He Fought for Is Gone
OutKick chief: Trump’s legacy has legs like Reagan’s
Feds Battening Down Hatches as J6 Pipe Bomb Revelation Nears – ‘Biggest Scandal of My Lifetime’ Says Glenn Beck Who Has Inside Track on Story
House Democrat sides with Trump officials on air traffic cuts amid shutdown chaos
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
