On Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said House Democrats wanted the so-called whistleblower to testify until President Donald Trump’s comments.
Schiff said, “We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything in the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first-hand information.”
Nobu chef killed after teen driver crashes into parked car in California
Catfight! Insiders Say ‘The View’ Hosts Ticked at ABC After Whoopi’s Hiatus – ‘Every One of Them Wanted [It]’
Breaking: Televangelist Jim Bakker Dies at 86
Trump signs order waiving off-road rule for red-dyed diesel at Nebraska rally
Dennis Hastert, longest-serving Republican House Speaker and convicted child molester, dies at 84
Trump Says the New York Times Is Lying About His Ohio Rally, and That He Has Proof
Video: USNORTHCOM Repositioning Hundreds of Troops to Rio Grande After Servicemen Fired on from Mexico
Trump clears way for Fort Hood terrorist to face Army firing squad nearly 17 years after massacre
Luxury fashion designers found shot dead in California as family reportedly reveals troubling lead-up
Text Messages Between Cornell Jane Doe and Alleged Attacker Turn Case on Its Head
Biden DOJ officials warned their school board investigation resembled ‘Anti-MAGA Task Force’
Muslim Flydubai Hijack Suspect Cited Quran, Repeatedly Called for Women to Be Abused, Slapped, Bashed in Head
Biden-era FBI tracked Trump family travel and Wiles’ calls with lawyers in secret probe: docs
Epstein survivor family claims GOP lawmaker’s staff ignored meeting request
El Sayed denies that Schumer PAC money will influence him in Washington
He continued, “Second, the president and his allies effectively put the whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy, and we ought to use the penally we used to use for traitors and spies, and that is the death penalty.”
He added, “We don’t need the whistleblower’s secondhand evidence anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and gratify the president’s desire for retribution. That is not a good enough will-be reason to bring in the whistleblower.”
Story cited here.
