In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.
Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”
Trump highlights comments by ‘Obama sycophant’ Eric Holder, continues pressing Senate GOP to nix filibuster
Pro-life center fights New Jersey attorney general’s ‘fishing expedition’ in Supreme Court battle
Chicago teachers union funneled millions to liberals while keeping members in the dark about finances
Stefanik blasts Johnson, GOP as ‘getting rolled’ by House Democrats
Florida officer shot in face during service call tied to mental health dispute; suspect killed
Trump warns Honduras of ‘hell to pay’ if election count changes, presses officials to finish tally
DHS launches ‘Cyber Monday deal’ in retro 90s holiday ad: $1,000 for illegal immigrants who self-deport
CAIR spins anti-Israel narrative about Somali fraud as scrutiny grows
Drug kingpin El Chapo’s son enters plea in multibillion-dollar drug trafficking case
US escalation with Maduro halts deportation flights to Venezuela
DHS reveals Illegal alien behind fatal crash was given license by deep blue state
Mamdani taps disgraced activist who said ‘one day we can abolish police’ to key public safety committee
Noem calls for ‘full travel ban’ on countries ‘flooding’ US with immigrants after DC attack
Spec ops chief ordered deadly Caribbean strike ‘in self-defense’ with Hegseth’s sign-off, White House says
Democrats open inquiry into Patel’s use of FBI jet
He contoued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The allegation is The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery. That is enough, in my opinion, to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it for the purpose of impeachment. The second charge will be high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation. The third crime will be obstruction of justice. The fourth will be interference with the witness, and the fifth, maybe, lying under oath.”
He added, “The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming.”
Story cited here.
