News Opinons Politics

FNC’s Napolitano: ‘Overwhelming’ Evidence to Justify 3 or 4 Articles of Impeachment Against Trump


In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.

Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”


Mexican Authorities Target Arizona Rancher Accused of Shooting Illegal Immigrant: Attorney
Report: Explosive Incident Was ‘the Last Straw’ That Got ABC Meteorologist Fired
Police at UCLA face off against left-wing mob, fortified encampment as campus anti-Israel protests escalate
Ernst leads Senate GOP demanding Biden ‘cease planning’ Gaza refugee acceptance
NY v Trump to resume with gag order hearing after Trump fined $9K, threatened with jail time
Chicago police arrest suspect in murder of off-duty officer heading home from work
Nickelodeon Adds Woke Twist to Reboot of Popular Kids’ Show ‘Fairly OddParents’
The White House has a new curator. Donna Hayashi Smith is the first Asian American to hold the post
Hulk Hogan Says He Received a ‘Jesus’ Voice Message from a Fellow Wrestler 2 Days After He Died
Georgia Gov. Kemp signs law requiring jails to check immigration status of inmates
Deion Sanders and His Son Slammed for Ugly Behavior Toward Players Who Left Colorado
2 West Virginia county commissioners removed after arrests for skipping public meetings
Former Ohio GOP Senate candidate Josh Mandel threatened with jail time in divorce case
Alec Baldwin Admits to Hard Drug Use in His Past – ‘I Don’t Discuss This a Lot’
$15 minimum wage inches closer to appearing on Missouri ballot


He contoued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The allegation is The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an act of bribery. That is enough, in my opinion, to make it over the threshold of impeachable offenses. I don’t think it’s enough to convict of bribery, but it’s enough to allege it for the purpose of impeachment. The second charge will be high crimes and misdemeanors — election law violation. The third crime will be obstruction of justice. The fourth will be interference with the witness, and the fifth, maybe, lying under oath.”

He added, “The evidence of his impeachable behavior at this point, in my view, is overwhelming.”

Story cited here.

Share this article:
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter

→ What are your thoughts? ←
Scroll down to leave a comment: