Justice Department Prepares to Launch Antitrust Investigation into Google

According to recent reports, the U.S. Justice Department is preparing to launch an antitrust investigation into Alphabet Inc.’s Google.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the U.S. Justice Department is preparing to begin an antitrust investigation into Google that could see the tech giant come under a new wave of scrutiny from regulators. According to people familiar with the matter, the antitrust division of the Justice Department has been gathering information and preparing for the investigation for weeks.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which shares antitrust authority with the Justice Department, has previously conducted antitrust investigations into Google on a broader scale but closed the investigation in 2013 with no action taken. Google did, however, make some voluntary changes to some of its business practices as a result of the investigation.

The FTC and Justice Department have been discussing which group will oversee further antitrust investigations of Google, with the FTC agreeing to give the Justice Department full jurisdiction over Google. Now that an understanding has been reached between the two government bodies, the Justice Department is preparing to conduct an in-depth investigation into Google. It has yet to be revealed if the Justice Department has contacted Google in relation to the investigation.

Breaking: Sir Patrick Stewart, Legend from Star Trek and X-Men, Has Died Due to Previously Undisclosed Health Issues

Judge grills AG’s office in Cornell sex assault case as ex-frat bro’s lawyer demands ouster over alleged bias

9 Alleged Cartel-Linked Train Bandits Arrested in California

Dem probes could ‘torture’ young Trump officials with crushing legal bills, subpoenaed conservative warns

Woman shot outside Virginia GOP headquarters in Richmond, party confirms

Report on alleged ‘second Dan Sullivan’ effort emerges after nearly 1 in 10 Alaskans voted

Why Lula’s reelection in Brazil is ‘not gonna make democratizing Cuba any easier’

Dead felon voting controversy grows as ‘Betty No Last Name’ surfaces in Spanberger’s rights restoration push

Bombshell: Ex-Wife Levels New Rape, Incest Accusations at Hugh Hefner, the Man Who Mainstreamed Pornography

Trump’s attacks on Abdul el Sayed could backfire with the Arab Americans who backed Republicans in 2024

Libertarians challenge Trump-backed Republicans, look to shake up midterms beyond GOP-Dem duopoly

OpenAI Sued for Wrongful Death After ChatGPT Allegedly Convinced Woman to Change Medication

Obama admin first launched the investigation into Ilhan Omar’s alleged brother marriage

Ex-chief says Christa Pike was ‘almost giddy’ describing murder as governor weighs in after botched execution

Maine, Kansas Senate races neck and neck as Democrats lead in Texas, Michigan, poll shows

Those familiar with the matter stated that the Justice Department has been in contact with third-party groups that have been critical of Google in the past. The Wall Street Journal reached out to the Justice Department and Google for comment on the matter but did not receive a reply. The FTC declined to comment on the issue.

Breitbart News reported in March of this year that Silicon Valley giant Google has been fined $1.7 billion by the European Union for the company’s third breach of E.U. antitrust laws in three years. The latest fine against the company relates to Google’s AdSense advertising service and “illegal practices in search advertising brokering to cement its dominant market position,” according to European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager.

Vestager and her team concluded that third-party websites that sued Google to power their search and advertising features had “restrictive clauses in contracts” preventing them from hosting ads from rival search engines. In a press release, Vestager stated:

Today the Commission has fined Google €1.49 billion for illegal misuse of its dominant position in the market for the brokering of online search adverts. Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anti-competitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules. The misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to compete on the merits and to innovate – and consumers the benefits of competition.